Sahel.ly Site Title

Sahelly – IT Solutions Company

Sahel.ly Test Results

Sahel.ly Mobile Performance: 26/100
Quick overview:
Diagnostics
More information about the performance of your application. These numbers don't directly affect the Performance score.
Enable text compression
Potential savings of 926 KiB
Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes. Learn more about text compression.
Properly size images
Potential savings of 2,700 KiB
Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time. Learn how to size images.
Some third-party resources can be lazy loaded with a facade
1 facade alternative available
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade.
Reduce unused CSS
Potential savings of 537 KiB
Reduce unused rules from stylesheets and defer CSS not used for above-the-fold content to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. Learn how to reduce unused CSS.
Minify CSS
Potential savings of 67 KiB
Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes. Learn how to minify CSS.
Avoid multiple page redirects
Potential savings of 630 ms
Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded. Learn how to avoid page redirects.
Reduce JavaScript execution time
11.6 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn how to reduce Javascript execution time.
Eliminate render-blocking resources
Potential savings of 6,660 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles. Learn how to eliminate render-blocking resources.
Largest Contentful Paint element
10,830 ms
This is the largest contentful element painted within the viewport. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint element
Minimize main-thread work
15.3 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn how to minimize main-thread work
Defer offscreen images
Potential savings of 3,117 KiB
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive. Learn how to defer offscreen images.
Serve images in next-gen formats
Potential savings of 3,140 KiB
Image formats like WebP and AVIF often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption. Learn more about modern image formats.
Reduce unused JavaScript
Potential savings of 1,437 KiB
Reduce unused JavaScript and defer loading scripts until they are required to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. Learn how to reduce unused JavaScript.
Reduce the impact of third-party code
Third-party code blocked the main thread for 7,740 ms
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact.
Avoid enormous network payloads
Total size was 7,354 KiB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. Learn how to reduce payload sizes.
Image elements do not have explicit `width` and `height`
Set an explicit width and height on image elements to reduce layout shifts and improve CLS. Learn how to set image dimensions
Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy
62 resources found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn more about efficient cache policies.
Ensure text remains visible during webfont load
Leverage the `font-display` CSS feature to ensure text is user-visible while webfonts are loading. Learn more about `font-display`.
Minify JavaScript
Potential savings of 16 KiB
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. Learn how to minify JavaScript.
Does not use passive listeners to improve scrolling performance
Consider marking your touch and wheel event listeners as `passive` to improve your page's scroll performance. Learn more about adopting passive event listeners.
Max Potential First Input Delay
1,520 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric.
Time to Interactive
39.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric.
First Meaningful Paint
8.6 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric.

Sahel.ly Mobile SEO: 92/100
Quick overview:
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Document does not have a meta description
Meta descriptions may be included in search results to concisely summarize page content. Learn more about the meta description.

Sahel.ly Mobile Best Practices: 79/100
Quick overview:
Trust and Safety
Does not use HTTPS
1 insecure request found
All sites should be protected with HTTPS, even ones that don't handle sensitive data. This includes avoiding mixed content, where some resources are loaded over HTTP despite the initial request being served over HTTPS. HTTPS prevents intruders from tampering with or passively listening in on the communications between your app and your users, and is a prerequisite for HTTP/2 and many new web platform APIs. Learn more about HTTPS.
General
Issues were logged in the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools
Issues logged to the `Issues` panel in Chrome Devtools indicate unresolved problems. They can come from network request failures, insufficient security controls, and other browser concerns. Open up the Issues panel in Chrome DevTools for more details on each issue.
Sahel.ly Mobile Accessibility: 65/100
Quick overview:
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Links do not have a discernible name
Link text (and alternate text for images, when used as links) that is discernible, unique, and focusable improves the navigation experience for screen reader users. Learn how to make links accessible.
Image elements have `[alt]` attributes that are redundant text.
Informative elements should aim for short, descriptive alternative text. Alternative text that is exactly the same as the text adjacent to the link or image is potentially confusing for screen reader users, because the text will be read twice. Learn more about the `alt` attribute.
`<frame>` or `<iframe>` elements do not have a title
Screen reader users rely on frame titles to describe the contents of frames. Learn more about frame titles.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
`[user-scalable="no"]` is used in the `<meta name="viewport">` element or the `[maximum-scale]` attribute is less than 5.
Disabling zooming is problematic for users with low vision who rely on screen magnification to properly see the contents of a web page. Learn more about the viewport meta tag.
Touch targets do not have sufficient size or spacing.
Touch targets with sufficient size and spacing help users who may have difficulty targeting small controls to activate the targets. Learn more about touch targets.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Properly ordered headings that do not skip levels convey the semantic structure of the page, making it easier to navigate and understand when using assistive technologies. Learn more about heading order.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Low-contrast text is difficult or impossible for many users to read. Learn how to provide sufficient color contrast.
Similar sites
Similar tests
www.sahel.com
www.sahel.net
www.sahel.org
www.sahel.info
www.sahel.biz
www.sahel.us
www.sahel.mobi
www.ahel.ly
www.sahel.ly
www.wahel.ly
www.swahel.ly
www.wsahel.ly
www.eahel.ly
www.seahel.ly
www.esahel.ly
www.dahel.ly
www.sdahel.ly
www.dsahel.ly
www.zahel.ly
www.szahel.ly
www.zsahel.ly
www.xahel.ly
www.sxahel.ly
www.xsahel.ly
www.aahel.ly
www.saahel.ly
www.asahel.ly
www.shel.ly
www.sqhel.ly
www.saqhel.ly
www.sqahel.ly
www.swhel.ly
www.sawhel.ly
www.sshel.ly
www.sashel.ly
www.ssahel.ly
www.szhel.ly
www.sazhel.ly
www.sael.ly
www.sabel.ly
www.sahbel.ly
www.sabhel.ly
www.sagel.ly
www.sahgel.ly
www.saghel.ly
www.sayel.ly
www.sahyel.ly
www.sayhel.ly
www.sauel.ly
www.sahuel.ly
www.sauhel.ly
www.sajel.ly
www.sahjel.ly
www.sajhel.ly
www.sanel.ly
www.sahnel.ly
www.sanhel.ly
www.sahl.ly
www.sahwl.ly
www.sahewl.ly
www.sahwel.ly
www.sahsl.ly
www.sahesl.ly
www.sahsel.ly
www.sahdl.ly
www.sahedl.ly
www.sahdel.ly
www.sahrl.ly
www.saherl.ly
www.sahrel.ly
www.sahe.ly
www.sahep.ly
www.sahelp.ly
www.sahepl.ly
www.saheo.ly
www.sahelo.ly
www.saheol.ly
www.sahek.ly
www.sahelk.ly
www.sahekl.ly
Last Tested: